Tha_Rainman Posted April 1, 2003 Report Share Posted April 1, 2003 Best GPU overclock is 113% on my Ti4400 from 275 to 310 Mhz stableBest VRAM overclock is also 113% on the same, from 550 to 621 with some artifacts...I could only do 110% core and 108% memory on my previous GeForce2 PRO. How far have you peeps pushed it? [post percentages] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
D-Eye Posted April 1, 2003 Report Share Posted April 1, 2003 I've done a overclock once, with a Petium2 :lol: 233Mhz - 266Mhz and still stable. It can go higher!! D-Eye Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Burns Posted April 1, 2003 Report Share Posted April 1, 2003 hehe that's my area Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tha_Rainman Posted April 1, 2003 Author Report Share Posted April 1, 2003 Hey give us a breakdown of the speed increase percentage increases will ya... I can't remember the model number codes. Thanks. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Burns Posted April 2, 2003 Report Share Posted April 2, 2003 1700+ = 1,463MHz2000+ = 1,663MHz figure out the % for me will ya :blink: , thanks ( :lol: studies remember (jk) ) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tha_Rainman Posted April 2, 2003 Author Report Share Posted April 2, 2003 Lazy bum!! Thats a 114% overclock... nice Any GPU overclocking stats? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Burns Posted April 2, 2003 Report Share Posted April 2, 2003 nah i'm happy with it now.. don't want to mess it up <_< Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PC-fre@k Posted April 5, 2003 Report Share Posted April 5, 2003 I was just trying something out and changed the FSB of my AMD 2000+ from 133 to 140 (not so much)and it was 1.667and it ran @ 1.753Thats only 105 % or so, but first I have to get my new CPU cooler (one with nitrogen in it or something like that)and then I coold rase it without blasting my CPU or MOBO or DDR (witch is also gonna run on the 140 Mhz- or whatever I set the FSB at)Somebody could tell me how to simply change the multilplier? (without messing with my cpu/mobo)> MSI KT3 Ultra 6380E> 768 Mb DDR PC-2700PC-fre@k Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tha_rooster Posted April 5, 2003 Report Share Posted April 5, 2003 I'm not aware of any method to change the multiplier as simple as that. However you can do the following that Tha_French has done on his amdXP cpu. By closing the L1 bridges with glue and some conductive paint. If you want further info on that i advice you to speak with him. He knows all about it . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tha_Rainman Posted April 5, 2003 Author Report Share Posted April 5, 2003 He knows all about it He did an entire extended essay on it for crying out loud Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Burns Posted April 5, 2003 Report Share Posted April 5, 2003 yep but you can do it quite easily though.. i guess.. keep in mind it's risky business, you might fry your cpuif you want to, i'll send over my extended essay, it has instructions on how to unlock your Athlon XP.you need a motherboard that supports multiplier changes though, as well as voltage changes.. B) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PC-fre@k Posted April 5, 2003 Report Share Posted April 5, 2003 I know how to make my CPU able of multiplier changes, but I hoped there was an other option (because I ain't gonna mess with my CPU)Only overclocking...Somebody knows hom much the DDR can have? (b4 fry)And whats normal for overclocking a AMD XP 2000+ ? (normal max Ghz)Off-topic: FS forums added Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Tweak Posted April 10, 2003 Report Share Posted April 10, 2003 Really All I have is a AMD XP 2400+ Runs at (2000Mhz) But when I changed the multis and the FSB it's runs at 166 FSB and is (2090Mhz) but with the added FSB it kicks a$$ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tha_Rainman Posted April 11, 2003 Author Report Share Posted April 11, 2003 Thats nice! So do you run your memory in synch with the FSB at 166Mhz? If the memory is DDR400 you could even up the FSB to 200MHz if your motherboard can handle it! Some peeps in my other forum run theirs at 200 everyday! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Tweak Posted April 11, 2003 Report Share Posted April 11, 2003 My mobo and everything can handle but my CPU can't stupid stepping is just the wrong one where I can only get to like 185 I think... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Burns Posted April 11, 2003 Report Share Posted April 11, 2003 Tweak,does a jump from 2000 to 2900 mhz make a big difference in performance on your com?just out of curiousity :lol: , why GFX do you use?? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Tweak Posted April 11, 2003 Report Share Posted April 11, 2003 Heya , I can't get it to 2900 because of the stepping. The highest it can go is like 2350Mhz and its more unstable the only reason Im able to put it to 16Mhz FSB is because I Change the multis from 15 to 12.5. And Im running a ATI 9700 Pro Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tha_Rainman Posted April 11, 2003 Author Report Share Posted April 11, 2003 wow! thats a wicked rig u got there Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Tweak Posted April 11, 2003 Report Share Posted April 11, 2003 Hey yeah if I was you I would wait for that it would be a pretty kick a$$ comp Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Burns Posted April 12, 2003 Report Share Posted April 12, 2003 sorry i meant 2090 2900 is way to much like 900 mhz increase 0__o Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tha_rooster Posted April 12, 2003 Report Share Posted April 12, 2003 the problem is you can always wait CD (Tha_Rainman). You can always wait for the next generation but some day you simply have to buy. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tha_Rainman Posted April 12, 2003 Author Report Share Posted April 12, 2003 So you think I should go with the Barton generation instead of the Athlon64? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Burns Posted April 12, 2003 Report Share Posted April 12, 2003 the athlon64 wil probably cost 1000sgd when it's out.. innit Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tha_Rainman Posted April 12, 2003 Author Report Share Posted April 12, 2003 (edited) Hmm.... well probably not that much but it certainly won't come cheap. And furthermore it may take upto 3-4 months more before the chipsets and motherboards come out for it. We'll see how long it takes for them to make boards for the Opetrons....EDIT: so maybe a 2800+ will be a better idea. I want to upgrade to something that is at least approx 3x fast. Edited April 12, 2003 by Tha_Rainman Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Tweak Posted April 13, 2003 Report Share Posted April 13, 2003 The best to do would most likely be to get the 3000 AMD But than you need money Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.